<span id="4n2"></span><progress id="4n2"></progress>
<listing id="4n2"></listing>
<menuitem id="4n2"></menuitem>
<noframes id="4n2"><span id="4n2"><video id="4n2"></video></span>
<span id="4n2"></span>
<span id="4n2"><strike id="4n2"></strike></span>
<menuitem id="4n2"></menuitem>
<ins id="4n2"></ins>

Why Nuclear Plants are a safe zone from terrorist attacks

Nuclear power plant

Possible aircraft attack

There has been a lot of contemplation over the consequences of occurrence of an attack by a large aircraft similar to the 2001 World Trade Centre attack in New York. This time the target being a nuclear facility aiming at radioactive materials. Studies show that nuclear reactors would be robust as compared to any other civil installations used to resist such attacks. A thorough study financed by the US department of Energy and conducted by US Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) concluded that the US reactor would be strong enough to withstand attacks from large commercial aircraft.


Lack of Australian nuclear plant almost immoral: Peter Cosgrove

The Former defence force chief Peter Cosgrove has pleaded for Australia to embrace nuclear power, criticising the “daily scrapping” between politicians about climate change.

Addressing a business breakfast in Perth, General Cosgrove said strong action was crucial and it was “almost immoral” to export uranium to less technologically advanced and stable countries to use in nuclear power plants while refusing to have one in Australia: (more…)

Warming to Nuclear Power

The Age yesterday released an Age/Nielsen poll demonstrating that 49% of Australians believed nuclear should be on the nation’s list of potential power options, with 43% opposed.


This is a major change from a level of just 38% in a 2006 Newspoll, with 51 per cent opposed.


The Real Target is 97%

With all the political talk about emissions targets, it is hard to get a solid reference point.? Here is one such reference.? Taking?the?long term sustainable emissions level from the?Stern Review (UK?Government 2007), we find that a 97% emissions cut will ultimately be?required in Australia’s case.


亚博体育官微广西| 亚博体育反水时间| 亚博体育足彩靠谱| 亚博体育app在哪里下载软件| 亚博体育与亚博娱乐| 亚博全站| 亚博官网app| 亚博娱乐网址| 亚博体育足彩app| yb亚博体育网页版登录| 亚博足球彩票| 亚博体育预测比赛| 亚博娱乐菲律宾| 亚博体育足彩用的多| 亚博娱乐用户登录首页| 亚博体育连赢8场| 亚博体育能用| 玩亚博赚钱| 亚博体育登录频道| 亚博体育vip官网| 亚博力滑雪场门票| 亚博体育是啥| 亚博串| 亚博体育正规| 亚博国际娱乐| 亚博体育应用| 亚博体育| 亚博体育电脑版| 亚博体育苹果app| 亚博体育是小平台| 亚博体育频道| 亚博体育提款流水规则| 中国福利彩票亚博体育| 亚博娱乐平台| 亚博体育如何提款频道| 亚博棋牌| 亚博体育c彩票| 亚博体育可以买足球| 亚博体育官网投注| 亚博体育微信群| 亚博体育纳斯达克上市| http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/cccTTjVR/83244.html http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/ccc140ig/ http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/cccTrioV/ http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/cccSAnry/32203.html http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/cccnB7BD/03716.html http://www.jiudianzhaopin.com/ccckUpEi/